WebJustia › US Law › Case Law › Pennsylvania Case Law › Pennsylvania Superior Court Decisions › 2024 › Com. v. Chichkin, I. Com. v. Chichkin, I. (opinion) Annotate this Case WebCOMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Louis R. EDMUNDS, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted March 6, 1990. Decided February 4, 1991. …
Com. v. Kohl :: 1992 :: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions ...
WebCOMMONWEALTH V. EDMUNDS. forth a time frame in which the marijuana was observed. 18 . A sup-pression hearing was then held, and it was determined that although the … WebOct 19, 2024 · Id. at 38, ¶ 141 (citing Commonwealth v. Edmunds, 586 A.2d 887 (Pa. 1991)). The Board, represented by the Attorney General, filed preliminary objections, which included a “lack of jurisdiction / improper venue.” While 42 Pa.C.S. § 761(a)(1) authorizes suits “[a]gainst the Commonwealth government,” the Board pointed to the charter communications petoskey
Com. v. Edmunds - Pennsylvania - Case Law - VLEX 892717425
Web2 days ago · PRICING AND VALUE The Audi has the lower starting price at $50,995, but with the base Q4 40 e-tron you have to make do with far less power than the Volvo, which starts around $55,000. But if you ... WebFeb 4, 1991 · Commonwealth v. Edmunds, 373 Pa.Super. 384, 541 A.2d 368 (1988). Allocatur was granted by this Court. The pertinent facts can be briefly summarized as … WebId. Appellant alternatively requests we hold there is an independent right to refuse a warrantless blood test under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, and that Section 1547(e) violates it. Id. at 12-14, citing Commonwealth v. Edmunds, 586 … charter communications overland mo