WebCriminal Procedure Code was filed in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar accusing Swarnjit Jam and Dalip Singh of committing offences punishable under sections 408 and 420, Indian Penal Code. This case relates to 73 bales of goods worth Rs. 12 lacs belonging to the Modern Syntex India (Limited), Alwar. (5.) WebDec 3, 2024 · The legal representatives of Shri Praveen Singh jointly filed Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22790/1990 and prayed for quashing of orders dated 27.12.1975, 8.7.1976, 7.8.1990 passed by the Prescribed …
Dalip Singh Alias Deepa v. State Of Punjab - casemine.com
WebDalip Singh and Others v/s State of Punjab Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1978 Decided On, 12 January ... As observed by this Court in Munnu Raja v. State of M. P. ((1976) 3 SCC 104 : 1976 SCC (Cri) 376 : (1976) 2 SCR 764) the practice of the Investigating Officer himself recording a dying declaration during the course of investigation ought not to ... WebAug 7, 2012 · The petitioner accused-Dalip Singh, instead of submitting to the jurisdiction of the trial Court, straightway jumped to prefer the present revision petition, to challenge the impugned order and charge-sheet dated 11.05.2012, invoking the provisions of Section 401 Cr.P.C That is how, I am seized of the matter. 8. poly triad dating
Dalip Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab - B&B Associates LLP
WebRanjit Singh (13 November 1780 – 27 June 1839), popularly known as Sher-e-Punjab or "Lion of Punjab", was the first Maharaja of the Sikh Empire, which ruled the northwest Indian subcontinent in the early half of the 19th century. He survived smallpox in infancy but lost sight in his left eye. He fought his first battle alongside his father at age 10. After his … WebDalip Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab Judgment Dated 08-07-1997 of Supreme Court of India having citation AIR 1997 SC 2985 , (1997) 11 SCC 573 , 1997 CRILJ 3647 , 1997 (2) CRIMES 6 (SC) , 1997 (2) ALD (CRL) 333 , 1997 (4) RCR (CRIMINAL) 58 , JT 1997 (5) SC 724 , 1997 (4) SCALE 403 , LQ/SC/1997/901 , include bench Judge HON'BLE MR. ... WebNov 28, 2016 · Though in this rendering, it was observed that in State of Punjab vs. Balbir Singh – (1994) 3 SCC 299 the provisions of Sections 52 and 57 of the Act had been held to be mandatory in character, it is pertinent to note that this Court in Sajan Abraham vs. … polytree.com