It is really true as reviewer suggested that

Author: gtvm

August undefined, 2024

Web2 jun. 2016 · In all, we found the reviewers’ comments are quite helpful. They point the deficiencies about our manuscript us, also the aspects that we have not done enough. It … WebI would recommend the rejection of a manuscript based on the following: 1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of ...

Is it useful for authors to acknowledge anonymous reviewers?

WebExpert: Reviewers should have published at least three articles as lead author in a relevant topic, with at least one article having been published in the last five years. In fields where a reviewer’s expertise is not typically measured by their publication record or if the suggested reviewer’s expertise is demonstrable in ways other than ... WebSome journals will request the author to suggest a reviewer (which really nullifies the notion of a double-blind review), whether they make use of these suggestions is worth finding out. Regards, Cite rockford archive

Finding Article Reviewers Open Research Europe

WebResponse 5) It is true the time step selected for the dynamical portion of a CTM must consider spatial resolution. However, we have selected a dynamical and chemical time step of 15 seconds for all model resolutions, adequate for accurately solving both chemistry and meteorology. Referee #1 minor comments: Referee #1 had several minor comments. WebAs suggested, we have created a supplementary table (eTable 12) which presents the SUCRA ranking for all agents for the primary outcome of advanced metachronous … Web24 nov. 2024 · As far as short-term impact, the data is clear: Fake reviews are extremely effective. In the two weeks after sellers began to recruit reviewers, their products’ ratings increased by an average 0 ... rockford appletree

What is your opinion on the Peer Review quality of ... - ResearchGate

Web1 jan. 2024 · 一、最初投稿Cover letter. 二、催稿信. 三、修改稿. 四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）. 五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）. 六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）. 七、文章校稿信件. 正文. 一、最初投稿 ... Web12 okt. 2024 · Rule 7: Whenever possible, begin your response to each comment with a direct answer to the point being raised. You can provide background information, but you should do so after giving your primary response. Provide a “yes” or “no” answer whenever possible. When the reviewer is correct, state so in your response. other friends lyrics fullWeb24 sep. 2024 · 1) You will help the journal tremendously if you come up with the names of suitable people. This can even help to speed up the review process, which benefits everyone, but especially you. 2) It gives you a possibility to suggest reviewers who you think would be most qualified to judge your paper, improving its quality. rockford apartments hickory nc

"Web101 views, 7 likes, 0 loves, 0 comments, 1 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from GGN Media: GGN Media was live. " - It is really true as reviewer suggested that

It is really true as reviewer suggested that

Web14 mrt. 2024 · 17th Mar, 2024. 6 Recommendations. Since the manuscript was accepted for publication, I see no reason to keep the reviewer's name anonymous. At the same time, acknowledging anonymous reviewers is ... Web26 dec. 2013 · I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××. 2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××. We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries ...

Did you know?

Web16. Good journals tend to have an excess of things that they want to publish. – StrongBad. Jul 24, 2013 at 14:51. 10. This so called editor needs to be educated about the difference about "in spite of" and "in light of". You can accept a paper in light of good reviews, and reject in spite of good reviews! WebIf a company doesn’t have a single bad online review, it quickly lands on the “too good to be true” radar. It just doesn’t seem trustworthy. You might know this from your own experience, but it’s also reflected in a study by the Northwestern University’s Spiegel Research Center . So, there's no reason to fear a couple of bad reviews.

Web11 feb. 2024 · This information is used in the automatic reviewer suggestions, so the more accurate it is, ... It is true that no research project is ever perfect, but do try to set your baseline at an average *ACL main track paper, rather than a Nobel prize-winning paper. Reviewer confidence. ... Ask yourself if this is really warranted. Web18 mei 2024 · If two reviewers make a comment on a particular area of your paper, even if the comments are conflicting, this should tell you something. For example, Reviewer 1 says “It appears the true objective of this study is X. Please reframe the introduction accordingly” and Reviewer 2 says “It appears the true objective of this study is Y”.

Webreviewing the full paragraph. Also, not all the studies described in detail the “INTRODUCTION” are really needed there. On the contrary, the authors could (maybe) mention more published studies that used L rhamnosus HN001 and B longum BB536. Authors’ response: Many thanks to Reviewer for his suggestions that we followed very … Web12 okt. 2024 · A frequent complaint from reviewers is that the authors failed to respond at all to several points raised in the review. In some cases, the reviewer may disagree with …

Web3 nov. 2024 · It is really true that every scientist is capable enough and carries out research to their best level which doesn't require any kind of corrections by the equivalent reviewer.

Web3 apr. 2024 · 站在作者的角度，我一般的response to reviewers会是： 1.首先写一段对编辑和审稿人表示感激的话，感谢他们付出的时间和经历，并表示意见很有用，我们针对意 … other friends lyrics nightcoreWebIn all, we found the reviewers’ comments are quite helpful. They point the deficiencies about our manuscript us, and help us for the further improvement. We have tried our best to … rockford apts for rentWebAre the sentences true or false? Answer 1. The reviewer didn ’t think she was going to enjoy the first film. 2. The first scene of the first film is important for the rest of the film. ... real world and the computer world and it worked really well. The special effects brought the computer world to life and I totally believed in it. But, ... rockford aquariumWeb17 mei 2024 · We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript … rockford area community endowmentWeb36. Being editor of a journal where authors can provide preferred and non-preferred reviewers, I can provide some "inside" thoughts on the subject based on what has happened in "my" journal. Note that it is possible to suggest names for review but also provide names which are not preferred. The latter can be because of a scientific … rockford area arts councilWeb30 mei 2024 · I'm stuck in this situation now - all 3 reviewers suggested some changes; while 2 were quite optimistic and also said that my work is interesting, the third one was really against it and suggested that we rewrite article anew, thus semi-rejected it; the reviewer really seems determined that our paper should not be accepted. other friends midi fileWeb329 Likes, 7 Comments - Monkeyseendo (@monk3yseendo) on Instagram: "Time for take out in Malaysia! . Restaurant: The Other Half Cafe . . Overall: True photography is..." rockford area carpet installation