WebMay 29, 2001 · Hamada (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1566, 1596, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 343; Storage Services v. Oosterbaan (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 498, 516, 262 Cal.Rptr. 689; Little v. Stuyvesant Life Ins. Co. (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 451, 469-470, 136 Cal.Rptr. 653; Merlo v. Standard Life & Acc. Ins. Co., supra, 59 Cal.App.3d at p. 18, 130 Cal.Rptr. 416.) WebSep 29, 2016 · Hamada (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1566, 1579.) “‘An agency is ostensible when the principal intentionally, or by want of ordinary care, causes a third person to believe another to be his agent who is not really employed by him,’” and the existence of an ostensible agency is a question of fact.
Goldberg v. Stelmach, B250524 Casetext Search + Citator
WebAug 28, 2008 · The existence of the right of control and supervision establishes the existence of an agency relationship.'" ( Michelson v. Hamada (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1566, … WebHadian v. Schwartz (1994) 8 Cal.4th 836: Michelson v. Hamada (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1566: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Superior Court (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 547: Contact us. Southern California Office. 234 East Colorado Boulevard Suite 975 Pasadena, California 91101. Tel: 626-535-9860 shelves for cats to walk on
CACI Prejudgment Interest - California Business Lawyer
WebMay 31, 2005 · Hamada (1994),29 Cal.App.4th 1566, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 343 [written agreements regarding billing and collection services created agency relationship between … WebNov 17, 1994 · Research the case of Michelson v. Hamada, from the California Court of Appeal, 11-17-1994. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you … WebFeb 25, 2003 · Hamada (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1566, 1580 [agent/principal].) Inherent in each of these relationships is the duty of undivided loyalty the fiduciary owes to its beneficiary, imposing on the fiduciary obligations far more stringent than that required of ordinary contractors. shelves for charging phones